| Ergebnis (50 % = 208,0 MP) |
|---|
| Rang | Nr. | Paar | MP | % | CP |
|---|
| 1. | 17 | Fr. Zieler – Hr. Starns | 285,0 | 68,51 | 42 |
| 2. | 3 | Fr. Booms – Fr. Waterkamp | 260,0 | 62,50 | 32 |
| 3. | 13 | Hr. van Kalker – Hr. Kozyczkowski | 240,0 | 57,69 | 24 |
| 4. | 9 | Fr. G. Fischer – Fr. Schmitz-Sinn | 239,0 | 57,45 | 18 |
| 5. | 6 | Fr. Scholz – Fr. Wehrheim | 238,0 | 57,21 | 13 |
| 6. | 1 | Hr. Hammer – Hr. Möller | 220,0 | 52,88 | 10 |
| 7. | 12 | Fr. von Oppen – Fr. Spamer | 216,0 | 51,92 | 7 |
| 8. | 5 | Fr. Grübel – Fr. H. Schmidt | 215,0 | 51,68 | 5 |
| 9. | 10 | Fr. Jaekel – Fr. Riesenhuber | 214,0 | 51,44 | 3 |
| 10. | 7 | Fr. Kimmel – Hr. Dr. Nijhawan | 209,0 | 50,24 | |
| 11. | 16 | Fr. H. Fischer – Fr. Mock | 208,0 | 50,00 | |
| 12. | 8 | Fr. Lorch – Fr. S. Schmidt | 201,0 | 48,32 | |
| 13. | 14 | Fr. Ballhorn – Fr. Volkhausen | 182,0 | 43,75 | |
| 14.-15. | 2 | Fr. Zielowsky – Hr. Griesenbeck | 178,0 | 42,79 | |
| 14.-15. | 15 | Fr. Haak – Fr. Saarmann | 178,0 | 42,79 | |
| 16. | 11 | Fr. Begemann – Fr. Molitor | 175,0 | 42,07 | |
| 17. | 18 | Fr. Westermann – Hr. Westermann | 150,0 | 36,06 | |
| 18. | 4 | Fr. Löffelmann – Fr. Münker | 136,0 | 32,69 | |