| Ergebnis (50 % = 286,0 MP) |
|---|
| Rang | Nr. | Paar | MP | % | CP |
|---|
| 1. | 13 | Hr. van Kalker – Hr. Kozyczkowski | 399,0 | 69,76 | 30 |
| 2. | 9 | Fr. Espitalier – Fr. Straube | 352,0 | 61,54 | 23 |
| 3. | 7 | Fr. Begemann – Fr. Molitor | 336,0 | 58,74 | 17 |
| 4. | 24 | Fr. Mock – Fr. Odenthal | 334,0 | 58,39 | 13 |
| 5. | 1 | Fr. Schulte – Hr. Schulte | 325,0 | 56,82 | 9 |
| 6. | 14 | Fr. Peter – Fr. Tilbrook | 312,0 | 54,55 | 7 |
| 7. | 21 | Fr. Kratz – Fr. Möller | 311,0 | 54,37 | 5 |
| 8. | 17 | Fr. Jaekel – Fr. Riesenhuber | 308,0 | 53,85 | 3 |
| 9.-10. | 19 | Fr. Helberg – Fr. Semrau | 306,0 | 53,50 | |
| 9.-10. | 10 | Fr. Zieler – Hr. Starns | 306,0 | 53,50 | |
| 11. | 12 | Fr. Ballhorn – Fr. Volkhausen | 297,0 | 51,92 | |
| 12. | 6 | Fr. Haum – Fr. Heckel | 293,0 | 51,22 | |
| 13. | 15 | Fr. Azizoglu – Fr. von Grotthuss | 291,0 | 50,87 | |
| 14. | 16 | Hr. Hammer – Hr. Möller | 281,0 | 49,13 | |
| 15. | 2 | Fr. Kimmel – Hr. Dr. Nijhawan | 278,0 | 48,60 | |
| 16. | 22 | Fr. Haak – Fr. Saarmann | 274,0 | 47,90 | |
| 17. | 23 | Fr. Vogelsgesang – Hr. Sureth | 266,0 | 46,50 | |
| 18. | 3 | Fr. Hucke – Fr. Türschmann | 257,0 | 44,93 | |
| 19. | 8 | Fr. Böff – Fr. Zimmer | 239,0 | 41,78 | |
| 20. | 11 | Fr. Grübel – Fr. H. Schmidt | 238,0 | 41,61 | |
| 21. | 5 | Fr. Werner – Hr. Ulrich | 229,0 | 40,04 | |
| 22. | 20 | Fr. Blochowitz – Fr. Jahn | 227,0 | 39,69 | |
| 23. | 18 | Fr. Jacubowsky – Fr. Oldengott | 226,0 | 39,51 | |
| 24. | 4 | Fr. Rindlaub – Fr. Sachs | 179,0 | 31,29 | |