| Ergebnis (50 % = 182,0 MP) |
|---|
| Rang | Nr. | Paar | MP | % | CP |
|---|
| 1. | 8 | Fr. Burghard – Fr. Jaekel | 252,0 | 69,23 | 22 |
| 2. | 10 | Fr. Baumbach – Fr. von Schenk | 210,0 | 57,69 | 17 |
| 3. | 5 | Fr. Jacubowsky – Hr. Jacubowsky | 207,0 | 56,87 | 12 |
| 4. | 15 | Fr. Kimmel – Fr. R. Walter | 202,0 | 55,49 | 9 |
| 5. | 2 | Fr. Weiß – Fr. Zorn | 198,0 | 54,40 | 7 |
| 6. | 9 | Fr. Oldenburg – Fr. Schweitzer | 187,0 | 51,37 | 5 |
| 7.-8. | 4 | Fr. Hausendorff – Fr. Spamer | 184,0 | 50,55 | |
| 7.-8. | 6 | Fr. Hellberg – Fr. Dr. Schliwa | 184,0 | 50,55 | |
| 9. | 7 | Fr. Dupree – Fr. Haum | 183,0 | 50,27 | |
| 10. | 16 | Fr. Faller – Fr. Metzen | 180,0 | 49,45 | |
| 11. | 14 | Fr. Dr. von Natzmer – Fr. Schweisgut | 178,0 | 48,90 | |
| 12. | 13 | Fr. von Grotthuss – Fr. von Mohrenschildt | 175,0 | 48,08 | |
| 13.-14. | 11 | Fr. Bußmann – Fr. H. Fischer | 156,0 | 42,86 | |
| 13.-14. | 12 | Fr. Kratz – Hr. Schulte | 156,0 | 42,86 | |
| 15. | 3 | Fr. Hofmann – Hr. Ulrich | 143,0 | 39,29 | |
| 16. | 1 | Fr. Dr. Ambrosius – Fr. Diehl | 117,0 | 32,14 | |